Answer audit
We check target questions for your sector in answer engines and record which brands are cited. Questions where you appear and where competitors lead are separated. That record sets the baseline, so we need your question list.
People increasingly read the answer inside an AI response rather than on a results page. GEO work builds the entity consistency, quotable content and technical access your brand needs to be shown as a source there.
Talk about your GEO visibility
To cite a brand as a source, answer engines must recognise it, verify it and be able to quote it. Each of those steps needs separate technical and editorial work.
Brand name, service definition, address, expertise and authorship are stated identically on your site and external profiles. Conflicting details make verification hard, so we close those gaps one by one.
Definitions, step-by-step methods, comparisons and first-hand observations are written so they can be sourced. Each piece answers one question clearly, and we ask you for verifiable examples and author details.
We bring structured data, HTML structure and page responses into a form answer engines can read. Robots rules and access barriers are reviewed, and crawlability is confirmed with technical checks.
We track manual answer engine checks, branded impressions, AI-referred sessions and the citation log together. That shows what earns a citation, and it decides the next topics we take on.
GEO is not a one-off fix; it is a measurement practice that updates as answers change.
We check target questions for your sector in answer engines and record which brands are cited. Questions where you appear and where competitors lead are separated. That record sets the baseline, so we need your question list.
We make the brand name, service definition, address and expertise consistent across your site and external profiles. Structured data, authorship and page titles are aligned with that definition. Conflicting details make verification hard, so we need your current information.
We publish quotable definitions, methods and comparisons. Each piece answers one question clearly and shows its source and author, not mass-produced text. Topics are chosen from the audit record, and we ask your team for first-hand experience and verifiable examples.
We re-check the same question set regularly and report citation and AI-referred session change. Which page was cited in which answer is logged, so improvement is not confused with coincidence. The next content work follows that log.
GEO became popular quickly and came with inflated promises. To be clear:
Answer engines do not disclose how they choose sources, so nobody can promise first place. We check the same questions regularly, record the change and show improvement through measurement.
Structured data alone is not enough; without original expertise worth quoting, visibility does not last. That is why technical fixes and editorial work run together, tied to one measurement record.
Content with no verifiable author or first-hand experience does not get cited. We build pieces on team experience, real service scope and checkable examples, and record who provided what.
If the same question set is not checked regularly, improvement and coincidence look alike. We fix questions and method at the start, then compare every check against the same baseline.
The biggest risk in GEO is unmeasurable promises. Every month we check the same questions with the same method and record the change.
See our SEO, GEO and AEO serviceThe questions chosen for your sector are checked in answer engines with the same method. We fix them at the start and ask you for sector terms and question ideas.
We track the impression trend of branded and topic queries in Search Console. The focus is whether the trend holds, and deviations are stated plainly.
Traffic arriving from answer engines is labelled separately in analytics, separate from other channels. That lets us follow how visits from AI answers change over time as their own line.
We record which page was cited in which answer, on the same log each time. It becomes a baseline, so the next content plan follows the record, not a guess.
SEO targets rankings in classic results; GEO targets being shown as a source inside AI answers. Both rest on the same base: clear, verifiable and consistent expertise.
Yes. We combine manual checks in answer engines for your brand and topics, branded search impressions, AI-referred sessions and citation tracking.
Clear definitions, step-by-step methods, comparisons and observations from your own data. Content with consistent authorship and dates is referenced more often.
Technical access and entity consistency fixes surface relatively quickly; content authority appearing in answers starts to be measurable within weeks. The process is measurement-led.